1581) Church Growth and Basic Truths (1972)

Image result for why conservative churches are growing dean kelley images


By Albert Mohler, April 25, 2011, at:  www.albertmohler.com

     By the late 1960s, liberal Protestants began asking a rather difficult question.  Why were the conservative churches growing?  In retrospect, one aspect of the liberal Protestant crisis was reflected in that very question.  The mainline Protestant denominations would have been better served by asking why their own churches were declining.

     Commissioned by the (liberal) National Council of Churches, researcher Dean M. Kelley set out to find out why conservative churches were growing, even as the more liberal churches were declining.  In his 1972 book, Why Conservative Churches are Growing: A Study in Sociology of Religion, Kelley argued that evangelical churches grow precisely because they do what the more liberal congregations and denominations intentionally reject — they make serious demands of believers in terms of doctrine and behavior.

     “Amid the current neglect and hostility toward organized religion in general,” Kelley noted, “the conservative churches, holding to seemingly outmoded theology and making strict demands on their members, have equalled or surpassed in growth the early percentage increases of the nation’s population.”

     With amazing insight and candor, Kelley spoke for mainline Protestantism when he noted that it had been generally assumed that churches, “if they want to succeed, will be reasonable, rational, courteous, responsible, restrained, and receptive to outside criticism.”  These churches would be highly concerned with preserving “a good image in the world” — and that meant especially within the world of the cultural elites.  These churches, intending to grow, would be “democratic and gentle in their internal affairs” — as the larger world defines those qualities.  These churches will intend to be cooperative with other religious groups in order to meet common goals, and thus “will not let dogmatism, judgmental moralism, or obsessions with cultic purity stand in the way of such cooperation and service.”

     Then, Kelley dropped his bomb: “These expectations are a recipe for the failure of the religious enterprise, and arise from a mistaken view of what success in religion is and how it should be fostered and measured.”

     Kelley then presented his considerable wealth of research and reflection on the phenomenon of conservative growth and liberal decline.  “Strong” religious movements make demands of their members in terms of both belief and behavior.  These churches demand adherence to highly defined doctrines that are to be received, believed, and taught without compromise.  They also understand themselves to be separate from the larger secular culture, and the requirements of membership in the church define a distance from secular beliefs and behaviors.

     The liberal churches are, by their own decision, opposed to these very principles.  The mainline Protestant churches desired to be taken seriously and respected by the intellectual elites.  They wanted the benefits of cultural acceptance and esteem.  They lowered doctrinal and behavioral requirements and made membership more a matter of personal preference than of theological conviction.

     Kelley concluded: “To the person who is concerned about the future of the ecumenical churches, this theory can offer little encouragement.  The mainline denominations will continue to exist on a diminishing scale for decades, perhaps for centuries, and will continue to supply some people with a dilute and undemanding form of meaning, which may be all they want.”

     …In a recent column in The New York Times, David Brooks raised similar issues…  He noted that many Americans “have always admired the style of belief that is spiritual but not doctrinal, pluralistic and not exclusive, which offers tools for serving the greater good but is not marred by intolerant theological judgments.”

     And he is right, of course.  This is an eloquent description of the religious disposition so well documented by Dean Kelley almost 40 years ago.  This describes the mainline Protestant aspiration — to be seen as serving the public good without the taint of theological judgment…  But, says Brooks, “Vague, uplifting, nondoctrinal religiosity doesn’t actually last.  The religions that grow, succor and motivate people to perform heroic acts of service are usually theologically rigorous, arduous in practice and definite in their convictions about what is True and False… 

     Note that Brooks defined the “strong” profile of belief with terms such as “rigorous,” “arduous,” and “definite.”  With considerable insight, Brooks informed his readers that rigorous theology “provides believers with a map of reality,” “allows believers to examine the world intellectually as well as emotionally,” “helps people avoid mindless conformity,” and “delves into mysteries in ways that are beyond most of us.”  Meanwhile, arduous codes of behavior and conduct “allow people to build their character.”  Brooks explains that “regular acts of discipline can lay the foundation for extraordinary acts of self-control when it counts the most.”

     Brooks concludes with a look at Africa, where conservative Protestantism is thriving.  He writes:  “I was once in an AIDS-ravaged village in southern Africa.  The vague humanism of the outside do-gooders didn’t do much to get people to alter their risky behavior.  The blunt theological talk of the church ladies — right and wrong, salvation and damnation — seemed to have a better effect.”

     In the span of just a few paragraphs, David Brooks made the same argument that Dean M. Kelley made in his book-length report on research four decades ago.  There is a wealth of insight in both analyses.  In the present context, evangelical Christians face many of the same questions asked by the liberal Protestant denominations in the 1960s and beyond.  The main question is always deeply theological: Do we really believe that the message of the Gospel is the only message that offers salvation?  

     …In the end, sociology can get us only so far and no further.  The rigor, ardor, and energies of evangelical churches must not be held merely in a desire to hold to a form of religion that will grow, but in a biblical commitment to hold fast to the truth of the Gospel and to share that saving truth with the whole world.


I Timothy 3:9  —  They must keep hold of the deep truths of the faith with a clear conscience.

Revelation 14:12  —  This calls for patient endurance on the part of the people of God who keep his commands and remain faithful to Jesus.

II Thessalonians 2:15  —  Stand firm and hold fast to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter.


Most gracious Father,
we pray to you for your holy Church.
Fill it with all truth;
in all truth with all peace.
Where it is corrupt, purge it.
Where it is in error, direct it.
Where anything is amiss, reform it.
Where it is right, strengthen and defend it.
Where it is in want, provide for it.
Where it is divided, heal it and reunite it in your love;
for the sake of your Son, our Savior Jesus Christ.

–William Laud  (1573-1645), Archbishop of Canterbury