2648) Irreconcilable Differences? (a)

         The book A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson is a fascinating overview of what scientists have learned about our earth and the whole universe.  It covers everything, from the very beginnings 14.5 billion years ago (give or take a couple months) right on up to the present time.  Bryson describes what scientists believe about the origins of the universe, about the birth and the death of stars, and about the vast number of far-flung galaxies.  Bryson then turns his attention to planet earth and how it began, how we got our moon, how the seas and dry land were formed, and how, over immense periods of time, the continents have been moving around on the face of the Earth like rubber ducks in a bathtub.  He also describes how perfectly our world had to be placed and fine-tuned in order to allow for even the possibility of life.  Then he describes current theories on the origins and evolution of life, in all its beauty and order and complexity.  Bryson even has a few chapters on that little sliver of time we would call the entire history of the human race.  Bill Bryson writes well, gives a wonderful account of what science has discovered about all these things, and adds a delightful human touch by telling amusing stories of the scientists who made these discoveries, and their odd quirks and eccentricities.  And he does this all in less than five hundred pages.

            Genesis chapter one could also be called ‘a short history of nearly everything.’  It also describes the beginnings of the universe and our planet earth, the origins and diversity of life, and the dawn of the human race. 

            But Bill Bryson and the first chapter of Genesis seem to tell two very different stories.  So, now what?

            This looks like a clear case of irreconcilable differences, and the last several hundred years has certainly been filled with plenty of nastiness by those on both sides of this great divide between science and faith.  What side are you on?  Christians do believe Genesis to be God’s inspired and Holy Word.  But we know scientists are really smart people, and they have come up with some pretty amazing gadgets to make our modern lives easier.  Could they be so very wrong about so many things?  What are we to think?

            This is what I think.  I believe that the Bible is God’s Word from cover to cover, and if anything any scientist says goes against the Bible, I say forget the scientist, I am sticking with the Word of God. 

            However, this all depends on interpreting what the Bible really is saying, and it all depends on what scientists have really discovered.  Good, solid, Bible believing Christians can and do disagree all the time on precise meanings of specific texts.  And different scientists, very often, come to vastly different conclusions based on the very same evidence.

          What does Genesis chapter one say?  Well, there are three basic foundational truths there that set the stage for the whole rest of the Biblical story, and which are essential to understanding your life and where you come from and where you are going.  I believe these three truths with my whole heart.  First of all, it says God created the world.  Second, it says God created it good.  Third, it says God created mankind in HIS image.  We are not just a more ‘fully evolved’ form of life, even if we share 96% of the same DNA as an earthworm.  And just because a chicken can be taught to plink out ‘America the Beautiful’ on a miniature piano for a television program, and chimpanzees can be taught to understand a few words, that doesn’t mean we are the same except for being just a little bit smarter.  We are different, we are special, we are spiritual, we are made in God’s image, and God created the world for us and us for Him, says Genesis.  All Christians believe these three things, and that sets us apart from many people in today’s world.  But we Christians can and do disagree on the rest of the details of the creation account. 

            In 1654, James Ussher, an Irish Archbishop using the Bible alone, calculated the creation of the world to have occurred on October 22, 4004 B. C. at 6:00 p.m., or, a little over six thousand years ago.  There are Christians today who, while not insisting on that exact date and time, do however believe the world to be less than 10,000 years old.  This is not my view, and I think it is very difficult to argue scientifically for such a timetable.  I believe in the Bible from cover to cover, but these people are interpreting the Bible to say far more than what it was intended to say.

            In my view, if Bill Bryson says the universe came to be over a period of 14.5 billion years, and the Bible says seven 24 hour days, we do not necessarily have a problem.  I don’t know how scientists come up with 14.5 billion years, but I do know that the Bible uses different types of literature, including poetry, to proclaim the truths God wants us to know.  And poetic imagery, while still telling the absolute truth, may tell it not with literal scientific facts, but with images and metaphors.  (continued…)

Related Posts

2408) May the Lord Bless You...
From 'The Blessing’ Sung Around the World: 100 Virtual Choirs...
Read more
2683) Martin Luther and the Reformation...
      The husband and wife team of Will...
Read more
533) Being Open About Death
 By Randy Alcorn, September 24, 2014 blog, at:  www.epm.org    ...
Read more

Discover more from EmailMeditations

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading